DealLawyers.com Blog

June 12, 2012

Delaware Applies Topping Bid Concept to Contested Settlement

John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson notes: Recently, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster delivered this opinion in Forsythe v. ESC Fund Mgmt. Co. (U.S.) I, L.P. In the opinion concerning a proposed derivative settlement, the Court of Chancery determined that it would enter a final order approving the settlement and the plaintiffs’ fee award in sixty days unless the objectors to the settlement “make the equivalent of a topping bid.” In order to forestall the Court’s approval of the settlement, the objectors must post a secured bond or letter of credit for the benefit of the nominal defendant, CIBC Employee Private Equity Fund (U.S.) I, LP (the “Co-Invest Fund”), for the full amount of the settlement consideration – valued at $13.25 million – and apply to take over the litigation. Should the objectors pursue the derivative claims and ultimately recover less than the settlement consideration, the Co-Invest Fund will have the right to execute on the posted security to collect any shortfall between the settlement consideration and the ultimate recovery.

Take Me Back to the Main Blog Page

Blog Preferences: Subscribe, unsubscribe, or change the frequency of email notifications for this blog.

UPDATE EMAIL PREFERENCES

Try Out The Full Member Experience: Not a member of DealLawyers.com? Start a free trial to explore the benefits of membership.

START MY FREE TRIAL